Data Processing System with Machine Learning Engine to Provide Output Generating Functions

ABSTRACT

Methods, computer-readable media, and apparatuses for identifying and executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests and collecting and analyzing social data to generate an output are provided. In some examples, user information may be received and one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified. An instruction may be transmitted to a computing device of a user and executed on the computing device to enable functionality of one or more sensors that may be used in the identified tests. Upon initiating a test, data may be collected from the one or more sensors. The collected sensor data may be transmitted to the system and processed using one or more machine learning datasets. Additionally, social data may be collected and analyzed using one or more machine learning datasets to generate a social profile. The sensor data and social profile may be used together to generate an output.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/727,226, filed Oct. 6, 2017, and entitled “Data Processing System with Machine Learning Engine to Provide Output Generating Functions,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/716,983, filed Sep. 27, 2017, and entitled “Data Processing System with Machine Learning Engine to Provide Output Generating Functions,” each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Aspects of the disclosure generally relate to one or more computer systems, servers, and/or other devices including hardware and/or software. In particular, aspects are directed to executing interactive condition evaluation tests and using machine learning to generate an output.

BACKGROUND

Mobile devices are being used to simplify people's lives around the world. However, it is often difficult to collect sufficient information via user input. In addition, determining an accuracy of information provided by a user can be difficult. Often, confirming accuracy may require in-person communication, additional documentation, and the like. Accordingly, executing a plurality of interactive tests generated by an entity to collect condition data, verify accuracy of data, and the like, may be advantageous.

SUMMARY

The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the disclosure. The summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure. It is neither intended to identify key or critical elements of the disclosure nor to delineate the scope of the disclosure. The following summary merely presents some concepts of the disclosure in a simplified form as a prelude to the description below.

Aspects of the disclosure relate to methods, computer-readable media, systems, and apparatuses for identifying and executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests to generate an output.

In some examples, user information may be received by a system, computing device, or the like. Based on the information, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified. An instruction, command, signal or the like, may be transmitted to a computing device of a user and executed on the computing device to enable functionality of one or more sensors that may be used in the identified interactive condition evaluation tests.

In some examples, a user interface may be generated by the system, computing device, or the like. The user interface may include instructions for executing the identified interactive condition evaluation tests. Upon initiating an interactive condition evaluation test on the computing device of the user, data may be collected from one or more sensors in the computing device.

In some examples, a determination may be made as to whether a triggering event has occurred. If not, data from the sensors may be collected. If so, the interactive condition evaluation test may be terminated and functionality associated with the sensors may be disabled.

In some arrangements, the data collected via the sensors may be transmitted to the system, computing device, or the like, and may be processed using one or more machine learning datasets to generate an output. For instance, the data may be processed to determine an eligibility of the user, identify a product or service for the user, or the like.

In some arrangements the test data may be used with additional data, such as social data to determine the eligibility of the user, identify a product or service for the user, or the like. For example, social data related to the user may be collected by the system from one or more devices, from social media accounts, email accounts, etc. The social media data may be scanned and analyzed to identify language or images providing an indication of the user's social behavior, habits, or lifestyle choices. The social data may be analyzed using one or more machine learning datasets to determine the user's social behavior, habits, or lifestyle choices. The analyzed social data may be used to calculate one or more social scores related to the user and to generate a social profile based on the social scores. The social scores and social profile may be used together with the test data collected via the sensors to generate the output regarding the user's eligibility. For example, output may be generated indicating one or more premiums, discounts, incentives, or the like, for which the user is eligible. The generated output may be transmitted to a computing device for display.

These and other features and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the additional description provided herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description in consideration of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:

FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate an illustrative computing environment for implementing multi-source data evaluation and control functions, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example multi-source data evaluation and control computing system, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIGS. 3A-3I depict an illustrative event sequence for performing multi-source data evaluation and control functions, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 4 illustrates one example flow chart illustrating an example method of performing a multi-source data evaluation and generating an output, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 5 illustrates one example flow chart illustrating an example method of performing a multi-source data evaluation and generating an output, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example flow chart illustrating an example method of performing a multi-source data evaluation using additional interactive condition evaluation tests and generating an output, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 7 illustrates one example user interface for executing an interactive condition evaluation test, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate example user interfaces for displaying a generated output, according to one or more aspects described herein.

FIG. 9 illustrates a network environment and computing systems that may be used to implement aspects of the disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description of the various embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, various embodiments of the disclosure that may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized.

Mobile devices are being used to perform functions that, at one time, required interaction between users, such as a customer and a vendor, service provider, or the like. However, accuracy of information provided, identity of a user providing input via the mobile device, and the like, may be difficult to confirm. Accordingly, it may be advantageous to identify and execute one or more interactive condition evaluation tests on the mobile device to evaluate a condition of a user, determine eligibility for one or more products or services, and the like. Additional ways of determining eligibility for one or more products or services may involve analyzing social data related to a user and collected from one or more devices, social media networks, and/or other electronic sources.

In some examples, a user may request a product or service (e.g., via a mobile device). The request may be transmitted to a system, computing platform, or the like, which may process the request and transmit a request for additional information. The user may provide the requested additional information via the mobile device. The additional information may include information such as name, age, gender, height, weight, location, email address, social media account information, authorization to collect information, and the like.

In some arrangements, based on the information provided, one or more products or services for which the user may be eligible may be identified. Based on the identified one or more products, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified to determine eligibility of the user. Additionally or alternatively, social data related to the user may be collected and analyzed to generate a social profile of the user which may be used to determine, at least in part, eligibility of the user for one or more products, services, incentives, rebates, discounts, etc.

In some examples, the system may transmit an instruction to the mobile device to enable one or more sensors associated with the identified one or more interactive condition evaluation tests. The one or more tests may then be executed by the mobile device. Data from the one or more sensors may be collected during execution of the tests and may be transmitted to the system for processing. In some examples, the system may analyze social data collected from the user's mobile device or other devices, social media networks, email accounts, and other electronic sources. The system may use the analyzed social data to generate a social profile for the user. In some arrangements, the system may use machine learning to evaluate eligibility of the user (e.g., based on the sensor data, the analyzed social data and/or the generated social profile, and/or other internal and/or external data), generate an output for a user (e.g., a product or service to offer), and the like.

These and other aspects will be described more fully herein.

FIGS. 1A-1B depict an illustrative computing environment for implementing and using a multi-source data evaluation and control system in accordance with one or more aspects described herein. Referring to FIG. 1A, computing environment 100 may include one or more computing devices and/or other computing systems. For example, computing environment 100 may include a multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, an internal data computing device 120, a first local user computing device 150, a second local user computing device 155, an external data computing device 140, a remote user mobile computing device 170, and a remote user computing device 175.

multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may be configured to host and/or execute one or more modules including instructions for providing various interactive condition evaluation test functions and/or factor prediction functions, one or more modules including instructions for performing various social data collection and analysis functions, and one or more modules including instructions for generating social profiles using analyzed social data. In some examples, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may be configured to receive data from a plurality of disparate sources, aggregate the data, use a machine learning engine to generate one or more predictions, generate and initiate one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, generate a social profile, and the like.

One or more aspects described herein may be performed by one or more applications downloaded or otherwise provided to a computing device (such as first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like) and executing thereon. In some examples, the one or more applications (or portions thereof) may execute in a background of the computing device.

Although various devices in the multi-source data evaluation and control system are shown and described as separate devices, one or more of multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, external data computing device 140, first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175, may be part of a single computing device without departing from the disclosure.

Internal data computing device 120 may have, store and/or include data obtained by an entity implementing the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and/or stored by the entity. In some examples, internal data computing device 120 may include data associated with customers, one or more insurance claims, accident histories and associated damages, costs, etc., user information, and the like. In some examples, internal data computing device 120 may include multiple computing devices storing various different types of data. In other examples, internal data computing device 120 may store the various types of data. In still other examples, internal data computing device 120 may query databases in one or more other computing devices, systems, or the like, to obtain data that may be used in one or more processes described herein.

External data computing device 140 may have, store and/or include data from outside of or external to the entity. For instance, external data computing device 140 may store or provide access to publicly available information, such as weather, traffic, population, demographic information, and the like. Additionally or alternatively, external data computing device 140 may store or provide access to data related to spending habits of one or more users (e.g., types of purchases made, amounts, locations of purchases, and the like). In still other examples, external data computing device 140 may store or provide access to data related to behaviors of users, such as frequency of gym visits, data collected by a wearable fitness device, and the like. In other examples, external data computing device 140 may store or provide access to social data related to users, such as social media posts from social networking services, email messages, text messages, chats, images related thereto, phone calls, contacts, social media friends and/or connections, etc. In some examples, the external data computing device 140 is a computing device of an individual associated with the user (e.g., a friend, connection, relative, individual having a device connected to a device of the user, etc.) and participating in a service provided by the multi-source data evaluation and control system. In some examples, the external data computing device 140 is a computing device of an external service provider which collects and analyzes social data. Various other types of information may be accessed via the external data computing device 140 in some instances. In some examples, external data computing device 140 may access information from various sources, such as via public network 195.

Local user computing devices 150, 155, internal data computing system 120, external data computing system 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and remote user computing device 175 may be configured to communicate with and/or connect to one or more computing devices or systems shown in FIG. 1A. For instance, local user computing devices 150, 155 and/or internal data computing device 120 may communicate with one or more computing systems or devices via network 190, while remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, and/or external data computing device 140 may communicate with one or more computing systems or devices via network 195. The local user computing devices 150, 155 and remote user computing devices 170, 175 may be used to configure one or more aspects of multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, display one or more notifications, execute one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, capture data associated with one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, collect and analyze social data, generate a social profile, display outputs, and the like.

In one or more arrangements, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175 may be any type of computing device or combination of devices capable of performing the particular functions described herein. For example, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175 may, in some instances, be and/or include server computers, desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smart phones, or the like that may include one or more processors, memories, communication interfaces, storage devices, and/or other components. As noted above, and as illustrated in greater detail below, any and/or all of multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175 may, in some instances, be or include special-purpose computing devices configured to perform specific functions.

Computing environment 100 also may include one or more computing platforms. For example, and as noted above, computing environment 100 may include multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. As illustrated in greater detail below, multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may include one or more computing devices configured to perform one or more of the functions described herein. For example, multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may have or include one or more computers (e.g., laptop computers, desktop computers, tablet computers, servers, server blades, or the like).

As mentioned above, computing environment 100 also may include one or more networks, which may interconnect one or more of multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, second local user computing device 155, external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175. For example, computing environment 100 may include private network 190 and public network 195. Private network 190 and/or public network 195 may include one or more sub-networks (e.g., Local Area Networks (LANs), Wide Area Networks (WANs), or the like). Private network 190 may be associated with a particular organization (e.g., a corporation, financial institution, educational institution, governmental institution, or the like) and may interconnect one or more computing devices associated with the organization. For example, multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, and/or second local user computing device 155, may be associated with an organization (e.g., a financial institution), and private network 190 may be associated with and/or operated by the organization, and may include one or more networks (e.g., LANs, WANs, virtual private networks (VPNs), or the like) that interconnect multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, and/or second local user computing device 155, and one or more other computing devices and/or computer systems that are used by, operated by, and/or otherwise associated with the organization. Public network 195 may connect private network 190 and/or one or more computing devices connected thereto (e.g., multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, and second local user computing device 155) with one or more networks and/or computing devices that are not associated with the organization. For example, external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175 might not be associated with an organization that operates private network 190 (e.g., because external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and remote user computing device 175 may be owned, operated, and/or serviced by one or more entities different from the organization that operates private network 190, such as one or more customers of the organization, public or government entities, and/or vendors of the organization, rather than being owned and/or operated by the organization itself or an employee or affiliate of the organization), and public network 195 may include one or more networks (e.g., the internet) that connect external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and remote user computing device 175 to private network 190 and/or one or more computing devices connected thereto (e.g., multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, internal data computing device 120, first local user computing device 150, and/or second local user computing device 155).

Referring to FIG. 1B, multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may include one or more processors 111, memory 112, and communication interfaces 113. A data bus may interconnect processor(s) 111, memory 112, and communication interface(s) 113. Communication interface(s) 113 may be a network interface configured to support communication between multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and one or more networks (e.g., private network 190, public network 195, or the like). Memory 112 may include one or more program modules having instructions that when executed by processor(s) 111 cause multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to perform one or more functions described herein and/or may include one or more databases that may store and/or otherwise maintain information which may be used by such program modules and/or processor(s) 111. In some instances, the one or more program modules and/or databases may be stored by and/or maintained in different memory units of multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and/or by different computing devices that may form and/or otherwise make up multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

For example, memory 112 may have, store, and/or include a product identification module 112 a. The product identification module 112 a may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to receive data from, for example, local user computing device 150, local user computing device 155, remote user mobile computing device 170, and/or remote user computing device 175 that may include a request for a product or service, information about a user requesting the product or service, or for whom the product or service is being requested, and the like. In some examples, the requested product may be a life or other insurance product. In some arrangements, information received may include name and/or other identifier of a user, age, gender, height, weight, and the like. Additional information, such as the user's email address, social media account information, and authorization to collect information may also be received. The information may be transmitted from the local user computing devices 150, 155, remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like, to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and may be processed by the product identification module 112 a to identify one or more products (e.g., a life insurance policy) to offer or recommend to the user. In some examples, interactive tests used to determine eligibility for the one or more products may be identified based on the identified one or more products, as will be discussed more fully herein.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include an interactive test identification module 112 b. The interactive test identification module 112 b may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to generate or identify one or more interactive condition evaluation tests based on one or more products identified by the product identification module 112 a. For instance, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified for execution by a user. The results of the identified one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may then be used, either alone or in conjunction with other data, for example, social data, to determine whether a user is eligible for the one or more products identified by the product identification module 112 a, a cost associated with the one or more products, a deductible associated with the one or more products, a discount or refund that may be available to the user if the user accepts one of the one or more products, and the like. Some example tests may include mobility tests, cognitive skills tests, breathing or other lung capacity tests, and the like. In some examples, the tests may be executed by the user on a mobile device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170, or remote user computing device 175. Types of tests, execution of tests, and the like, will be discussed more fully herein.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a sensor activation module 112 c. Sensor activation module 112 c may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to activate or enable one or more sensors of a plurality of sensors in a user computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like. Some example sensors may include accelerometers, global positioning system (GPS) sensors, gyroscopes, pressure sensors, humidity sensors, pedometer, heart rate sensors, pulse sensors, breathing sensors, one or more cameras or other image capturing devices, and the like. Sensors may also include components of the computing device, such as a usage monitor, or the like, that may record or detect operation of the device, applications executed, contact with a display of the device, user input, and the like. Upon identifying, by the interactive test identification module 112 b, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests to be executed, the sensor activation module 112 c may transmit a signal, instruction, or command to the computing device (e.g., remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like) activating and/or enabling one or more sensors. In some examples, the sensors activated or enabled may be sensors identified for use with the identified one or more interactive condition evaluation tests. In some arrangements, the sensors activated or enabled may be fewer than all sensors associated with the computing device.

Memory 112 may further have, store, and/or include an interface generation module 112 d. The interface generation module 112 d may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to generate one or more user interfaces associated with each identified interactive condition evaluation test. For example, for each test identified, by the interactive test identification module 112 b, for execution, the interface generation module 112 d may generate one or more user interfaces including, for example, information associated with each test, instructions for initiating and/or performing each test, and the like. The interface generation module 112 d may transmit the user interfaces to a user computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like, and may cause the user interface(s) to display on the device.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a sensor data analysis module 112 e. Sensor data analysis module 112 e may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to receive sensor data from a computing device executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests (e.g., remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like) and analyze the sensor data. In some examples, the sensor data analysis module 112 e may receive raw sensor data and may process the data (e.g., filter, smooth, or the like) to identify data for analysis (e.g., data to provide the most accurate analysis available). In some examples, one or more machine learning datasets may be used to evaluate data from the sensor data analysis module 112 e to evaluate a condition of the user executing the test associated with the sensor data, as will be discussed more fully herein. In some examples, sensor data may include an outcome of a mobility test (e.g., walk a predetermined distance, walk a predetermined time on a treadmill at a designated speed, or the like), an outcome of a reflex analysis (e.g., how quickly a user responds to a prompt on the device), an outcome of one or more cognitive skills tests (e.g., questions directed to evaluating memory, recognition, and the like), an outcome of a biometric test, such as a lung capacity test (e.g., as determined from a force on which a user exhales onto the computing device from a predetermined distance), and the like.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a social data collection module 112 f. Social data collection module 112 f may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to receive social data from a plurality of sources, such as external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or other computing devices. In some examples, the social data may be collected from a social networking service or an email server. For instance, social data collection module 112 f may scan one or more of external data computing device 140, remote user mobile computing device 170, and remote user computing device 175 to collect social data associated with the user. In some examples, the social data collection module 112 f may further scan social media accounts and/or email accounts associated with the user to collect social data of the user. In some examples, the social data collection module 112 f may further scan other devices associated with the user, such as wearable devices, fitness trackers, etc. The social data collected by the social data collection module 112 f may include social media posts from social networking services, email messages, text messages, chats, images, videos, phone calls, contacts, data identifying social media friends and/or connections, etc. For instance, social data collection module 112 f may scan various social networking service accounts associated with the user to collect social data, such as comments, images, video, chats, messages, friends/connections, etc. posted by the user. Social data collection module 112 f may additionally scan various social networking service accounts of friends, connections, relatives, individuals having devices connected to a device of the user, etc. to collect comments, images, video, chats, messages, friends/connections, etc. related to the user. Further, social data collection module 112 f may scan one or more user computing devices associated with the user, such as remote user mobile computing device 170 or remote user computing device 175, or one or more computing devices associated with friends, connections, relatives, individuals having devices connected to a device of the user, etc. to collect social data such as emails, text messages, images, videos, phone calls, contacts, chats, etc. stored on the device. The social data may be collected with permission of the user and others associated with the user from whom data is collected, such as friends, connections, relatives, individuals having devices connected to a device of the user, etc. In this case, such friends, connections, relatives, etc. may also participate in the services provided by the multi-source data evaluation and control system.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a social data analysis module 112 g. Social data analysis module 112 g may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to analyze the social data received from social data collection module 112 f. In some examples, the social data received from social data collection module 112 f may be processed and analyzed to glean a user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices. For instance, the collected social data may be scanned for language and images tending to reflect risky and/or positive behavior, habits, or lifestyle choices of the user. For example, images showing or posts commenting on a user smoking or skydiving may tend to reflect risky behavior on the part of the user, while images showing or posts commenting on the user exercising or engaging in healthy eating may tend to reflect positive behavior on the part of the user. Further, research shows that social connections and social interactions play a significant role in an individual's physical and mental well-being and longevity. Such research shows that individuals with meaningful and emotionally healthy relationships are generally happier, have few health-related issues, and live longer lives. Accordingly, in some examples, the social data received from social data collection module 112 f may be processed and analyzed to glean a user's degree of social connectedness. For instance, the collected social data may be scanned to determine a number of social interactions, such as a number of text messages or emails sent or received, a number of phone calls placed or received, a number of posts made, a number of posts in which the user is referenced, a number of photos posted, a number of photos containing images of the user, a number of friends/connections, a number of individuals followed, a number of followers, etc. However, research further shows that it is the quality of the social connections which counts more than the number of social connections, such that even those with meaningful social connections and unhealthy lifestyles tend to live longer lives than those who have healthier lifestyles but poor social connections. Accordingly, collected social data may be further scanned to glean a quality of the user's social connections. For instance, posts containing comments referring to the user's love or affection of a connection or posts referring the love or affection that a connection may have for the user may tend to show that the social connection is a meaningful one. In some examples, one or more machine learning datasets may be used to analyze the social data received from the social data collection module 112 f to glean a user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a social profile generation module 112 h. Social profile generation module 112 h may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to generate a social profile for the user. The social profile for the user may comprise a social score which may be calculated by weighting differently defined categories of analyzed social data. For example, different weighting factors may be used to weigh different categories of analyzed social data. For instance, the different categories of analyzed social data may include: images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in risky behavior, posts posted by the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, images taken by another individual of the user engaging in risky behavior, posts posted by another individual describing the user engaging in risky behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by another individual to the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in positive behavior, posts posted by the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, images taken by another individual of the user engaging in positive behavior, posts posted by another individual describing the user engaging in positive behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by another individual to the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, text messages sent by the user, text messages received by the user, emails sent by the user, emails received by the user, phone calls placed by the user, phone calls received by the user, chats initiated by the user, chats received by the user, posts posted by the user, posts in which the user is referenced, photos containing images of the user, emails/texts/chats/posts showing meaningful connections, images showing meaningful connections, etc. Each of the different categories may have a different weighting factor associated with the category. For example, categories of social data related to safe behavior may have higher weighting factors than those categories related to risky behavior or those categories indifferent to behavior. The weighting factors may be multiplied by the number of instances of the analyzed social data for each of the different categories of analyzed data to obtain a series of component social scores.

For example, in the case that a first weighting factor is associated with the category of images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in risky behavior, the first weighting factor may be multiplied by the number of images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in risky behavior to obtain a first component social score. As another example, in the case that a second weighting factor is associated with the category of emails received by the user, the second weighting factor may be multiplied by the number of emails received by the user to obtain a second component social score. A component social score may be calculated (e.g., by multi-source data evaluation and control data identifying for each category of analyzed social data. The component social scores may be aggregated to determine an overall social score. The overall social score may be a numeric or non-numeric value, such as a number ranging from 1 to 100 or a letter ranging from A to F. The overall social score may be represented in a variety of different ways, e.g., by other numbers or letters, by words, by phrases, etc.

In some examples, the overall social scores may be categorized into groups and ranked. As an example, an overall social score between 1 to 20 may be considered a low score, an overall social score between 21 and 40 may be considered a below average score, an overall social score between 41 and 60 may be considered an average score, an overall social score between 61 and 80 may be considered an excellent score, and an overall social score above 80 may be considered an exceptional score. A low overall social score may reflect a higher level of risk then a higher social score. The social profile may be comprised of the component scores and/or the overall social score and may reflect a determination of a user's risk based on the collected social data. The social profile may be used as a factor in an insurance eligibility determination by multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, as described below in further detail.

Memory 112 may further have, store and/or include a data aggregation module 112 i. Data aggregation module 112 i may store instructions and/or data that may cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to receive data from a plurality of sources. For instance, data may be received from one or more internal sources (e.g., internal data computing device 120) and/or from one or more external sources (e.g., external data computing device 140). The data may include data associated with users (e.g., names, addresses, ages, genders, email addresses, social media account information, authorization to collect information, and the like), demographic information, locality information, behavioral information (e.g., exercise habits, each habits, etc.), purchase habits or history, medical information, social data (e.g., social media posts from social networking services, email messages, text messages, chats, images related thereto, phone calls, contacts, social media friends/connections, etc.) and the like. Some or all of the data may be collected with permission of the user. In some examples, one or more machine learning datasets may be used to evaluate the aggregated data, either alone or in conjunction with other data (e.g., sensor data, data from one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, additional collected social data, social scores, social profiles, or the like) to determine one or more outputs, as will be discussed more fully herein.

Memory 112 may further have, store, and/or include a machine learning engine 112 j and machine learning datasets 112 k. Machine learning engine 112 j and machine learning datasets 112 k may store instructions and/or data that cause or enable multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to evaluate data, such as sensor data, social data, social scores, social profiles, or other data from a computing device executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, aggregated data from internal sources, external sources, and the like, to generate or determine one or more outputs (e.g., by output generation module 1121). The machine learning datasets 112 k may be generated based on analyzed data (e.g., data from previously executed interactive condition evaluation tests, social data, historical data from internal and/or external sources, and the like), raw data, and/or data received from one or more outside sources.

The machine learning engine 112 j may receive data (e.g., social data, social scores, social profiles, data collected during one or more interactive condition evaluation tests executed by and received from, for example, remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like, internal data computing device 120, external data computing device 140, and the like) and, using one or more machine learning algorithms, may generate one or more machine learning datasets 112 k. Various machine learning algorithms may be used without departing from the disclosure, such as supervised learning algorithms, unsupervised learning algorithms, regression algorithms (e.g., linear regression, logistic regression, and the like), instance based algorithms (e.g., learning vector quantization, locally weighted learning, and the like), regularization algorithms (e.g., ridge regression, least-angle regression, and the like), decision tree algorithms, Bayesian algorithms, clustering algorithms, artificial neural network algorithms, and the like. Additional or alternative machine learning algorithms may be used without departing from the disclosure. In some examples, the machine learning engine 112 j may analyze data to identify patterns of activity, sequences of activity, and the like, to generate one or more machine learning datasets 112 k.

The machine learning datasets 112 k may include machine learning data linking one or more outcomes of an interactive condition evaluation test, types or amounts of sensor data, historical behavioral data, transaction data, health data, social data, social scores, social profiles, or the like (or combinations thereof) to one or more outputs. For instance, data may be used to generate one or more machine learning datasets 112 k linking data from interactive condition evaluation tests, internal user data, external user data, social data, social scores, social profiles, and the like, to outputs, such as a mortality rate, likelihood of developing one or more illnesses or diseases, likelihood of risk-taking behavior, and the like. This information may be used to evaluate a risk associated with a user requesting a product or service (e.g., a life insurance product or service) to determine a premium of an insurance policy, a discount, rebate or other incentive to offer to the user, and the like. In some examples, the information may be used to evaluate risk associated with a user requesting an auto or home product or service (e.g., data identifying insurance product). The information may be used to determine a premium, deductible, incentive, or the like.

The machine learning datasets 112 k may be updated and/or validated based on later -received data. For instance, as additional interactive condition evaluation tests are executed, as additional social data is collected and social scores are calculated and social profiles generated, as data is collected or received from internal data computing device 120, external data computing device 140, and the like, the machine learning datasets 112 k may be validated and/or updated based on the newly received information. Accordingly, the system may continuously refine determinations, outputs, and the like.

The machine learning datasets 112 k may be used by, for example, an output generation module 112 l stored or included in memory 112. The output generation module 112 1 may store instructions and/or data configured to cause or enable the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to generate one or more outputs based on the machine learning dataset 112 k analysis of data (e.g., sensor data, social data, social scores, social profile, aggregate data, and the like). For instance, as discussed above, the output generation module 112 l may generate one or more premiums, discounts, incentives, or the like, related to a product identified for a user, requested by a user, or the like. In some examples, the output generation module 112 l may transmit the generated output to a computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170, remote user computing device 175, or the like, and may cause the generated output to display on the device. In some arrangements, the output may be transmitted to the computing device from which the user requested a product, on which the one or more interactive condition evaluation tests were executed, or the like.

FIG. 2 is a diagram of an illustrative multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 including a multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, an external computing device 240, a mobile device 250, and additional related components. Each component shown in FIG. 2 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of the two. Additionally, each component of the multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 may include a computing device (or system) having some or all of the structural components described herein for computing device 901 in FIG. 9. The multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 may also include or be in communication with one or more computing platforms, servers, devices, and the like, shown and described with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1B.

One or more components shown in FIG. 2, multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, external data computing device 240, and/or mobile device 250 may communicate with each other via wireless networks or wired connections, and each may communicate with additional mobile computing devices, other remote user computing devices (e.g., remote user computing device 170) and/or a number of external computer servers, devices, etc. over one or more communication networks 230. In some examples, the mobile computing device 250 may be paired (e.g., via Bluetooth™ technology) to one or more other devices (e.g., another user personal mobile computing device, such as a wearable device, tablet, etc.). If the device is no longer in proximity to be paired (e.g., mobile computing device 250 is no longer near enough to another user personal mobile computing device to be paired) a notification may be generated and displayed on the device 250 (e.g., to indicate that a device may have been left behind).

As discussed herein, the components of multi-source data evaluation and control system 200, operating individually or using communication and collaborative interaction, may perform such features and functions such as identifying one or more products or services, identifying one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, collecting data associated with one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, retrieving data from one or more internal and/or external sources, collecting social data, calculating social scores using the collected social data, generating a social profile, generating an output, and the like.

Multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 may include one or more mobile devices 250. Mobile device 250 may be, for example, smartphones or other mobile phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), tablet computers, laptop computers, wearable devices such as smart watches and fitness monitors, and the like. Mobile device 250 may include some or all of the elements described herein with respect to the computing device 901.

Mobile device 250 may include a network interface 251, which may include various network interface hardware (e.g., adapters, modems, wireless transceivers, etc.) and software components to enable mobile device 250 to communicate with multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, external computing device 240, and various other external computing devices. One or more specialized software applications, such as test analysis application 252 and social data analysis and social profile generation application 256 may be stored in the memory of the mobile device 250.

The test analysis application(s) 252 may be received via network interface 251 from the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, or other application providers (e.g., public or private application stores). Certain test analysis applications 252 might not include user interface screens while other test analysis applications 252 may include user interface screens that support user interaction. Such test analysis applications 252 may be configured to run as user-initiated applications or as background applications. The memory of mobile device 250 also may include databases configured to receive and store sensor data received from mobile device sensors, usage type, application usage data, and the like. Although aspects of the test analysis application(s) 252 are described as executing on mobile device 250, in various other implementations, some or all of the test analysis functionality described herein may be implemented by multi-source data evaluation and control server 210.

The social data analysis and social profile generation application 256 may be received via network interface 251 from the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, or other application providers (e.g., public or private application stores). Certain social data analysis and social profile generation applications 256 might not include user interface screens while other social data analysis and social profile generation applications 256 may include user interface screens that support user interaction. Such social data analysis and social profile generation applications 256 may be configured to run as user-initiated applications or as background applications. The memory of mobile device 250 also may include databases configured to receive and store social data received from the mobile device 250, one or more additional devices, social networking services, email servers, and the like. Although aspects of the social data analysis and social profile generation applications 256 are described as executing on mobile device 250, in various other implementations, some or all of the social data analysis and social profile generation functionality described herein may be implemented by the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210.

As discussed herein, mobile device 250 may include various components configured to generate and/or receive data associated with execution of one or more interactive condition evaluation tests by or on the mobile device 250, and/or data associated with usage of the mobile device 250. For example, using data from sensors 253 (e.g., 1-axis, 2-axis, or 3-axis accelerometers, compasses, speedometers, vibration sensors, pressure sensors, gyroscopic sensors, etc.) and/or GPS receivers or other location-based services (LBS) 254, test analysis application 252 (or other device or module, e.g., multi-source data evaluation and control server 210) may determine movement of the mobile device 250, evaluate actions performed with or on the mobile device 250, and the like. The sensors 253 and/or GPS receiver or LBS component 254 of the mobile device 250 may also be used to determine speeds (e.g., walking pace, running pace, etc.), force on the mobile device 250, response times for providing input to the mobile device 250, and the like.

Mobile device 250 may further include a usage monitor 255. The usage monitor 255 may be a computing device (e.g., including a processor, computing, etc.) and may include hardware and/or software configured to monitor various aspects of the usage of the mobile device 250. For instance, the usage monitor 255 may monitor a number of minutes, hours, or the like the device is in use (e.g., based on factors such as device being illuminated, user interacting with or looking at the device, etc.). Further, the usage monitor 255 may monitor which applications are used above a threshold amount of time in a predetermined time period (e.g., one day, one week, one month, or the like). In still other examples, the usage monitor 255 may determine a type of motion or speed of motion associated with movement of the mobile device 250, whether the device is maintained within a case, and the like. Additional aspects of device usage may be monitored without departing from the disclosure. Data related to usage of the mobile device 250 may be used to determine one or more outputs (e.g., may indicate decreased mobility, inactive lifestyle, and the like).

The mobile device 250 may be configured to establish communication with the multi -source data evaluation and control server 210 via one or more wireless networks (e.g., network 230).

The multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 may further include an external data computing device 240. External data computing device 240 may store or receive data from one or more external data sources, such as user information, health information, automotive information (e.g., driving behaviors, operational parameters, make, model, trim, etc.), transaction information, user behavioral information, social data, and the like. This information may be aggregated and processed, for instance, by multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, to generate one or more outputs. The external data computing device 240 may include an external data database 242 that may store data from one or more external sources for use in generating one or more outputs.

The multi-source data evaluation and control system 200 also may include one or more external servers, such as multi-source data evaluation and control server 210 which may contain some or all of the hardware/software components as the computing device 901 depicted in FIG. 9.

The multi-source data evaluation and control server 210 may include some or all of the components and/or functionality described with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1B. The multi -source data evaluation and control server 210 may include one or more internal data databases 212 configured to store data associated with, for example, data internal to the entity (e.g., user or customer data, historical data relating to claims, accidents, social data, and the like), that may be used to evaluate risk. Further, the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210 may include test performance analysis module 211 which may provide some or all of the operations and/or functionality described with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1B.

FIGS. 3A-3I illustrate one example event sequence for executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, generating a social profile, and determining an output in accordance with one or more aspects described herein. The sequence illustrated in FIGS. 3A-3I is merely one example sequence and various other events may be included, or events shown may be omitted, without departing from the disclosure.

With reference to FIG. 3A, in step 301, a request for a particular product or service, or type of product or service may be received by a user computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170. The request may include a request to purchase the particular product or service. In some examples, the request may include information associated with a user for whom the request is made (e.g., name, contact information, and the like).

In step 302, the request may be transmitted from the remote user mobile computing device 170 to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. The request may be received by the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 in step 303 and the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may process the request.

In step 304, a request for additional user information may be generated. The request may include a request for information associated with the particular user, such as age, gender, location, occupation, tobacco usage, email address, social media account information, and the like. The request may additionally include a request for authorization to collect social data from a user's social media accounts, email accounts, remote user mobile computing device 170, and other devices associated with the user, such as fitness devices, wearable devices, etc. The request may additionally include a request for authorization to collect social data from the social media accounts and devices of friends/connections of the user who also participate in the service provided by the multi-source data evaluation and control system and who have independently agreed to have social data collected from their social media accounts and devices.

In step 305, the request for additional user information may be transmitted to the remote user mobile computing device 170 and, in step 306, the request for additional information may be received by the remote user mobile computing device 170.

With reference to FIG. 3B, in step 307, the requested additional user information may be received by the remote user mobile computing device 170. In step 308, the received additional user information may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

In step 309, the received additional user information may be processed to identify one or more products or services to offer to the user that meet the request provided by the user (e.g., if the user has requested a life insurance policy, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may identify one or more life insurance policies that may be suitable for the user based on the user information and that may be offered to the user).

In step 310, a request for data may be generated. For instance, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may generate one or more requests for data associated with the user. The requests may include data related to health information of the user, spending habits or other transaction information, lifestyle information, driving behaviors, insurance claim information, social data, and the like. The data requests may be transmitted to an external data computing device 140 in step 311 and/or an internal data computing device 120 in step 312. In some examples, requests for data may be transmitted to additional computing devices. In some arrangements, the requests for data may include a name or other unique identifier of a user that may be used as input in a query to identify the desired data.

With reference to FIG. 3C, the request for data may be received by the external data computing device 140 in step 313 and the internal data computing device 120 in step 314. In steps 315 and 316, the requested data may be extracted from the external data computing device 140 and internal data computing device 120, respectively. In step 317, data extracted from the external data computing device 140 may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. In step 318, data extracted from the internal data computing device 120 may be transmitted to the multi -source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

With reference to FIG. 3D, in step 319, the extracted data may be received and, in step 320, the extracted data may be aggregated. In some examples, step 320 of aggregating the data may be optional.

In step 321, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests to determine eligibility for the one or more identified products may be identified. For instance, based on the one or more products or services identified for the user, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified. In some examples, a plurality of different types of interactive condition evaluation tests may be stored and, in step 321, one or more of the plurality of tests may be selected or identified for execution on the remote user mobile computing device 170. Particular types of tests will be discussed more fully herein.

For instance, data associated with the user may be used to identify one or more products to offer to the user and the identified one or more products may be used to identify one or more interactive condition evaluation tests to execute. In some examples, user information (e.g., age, health information, and the like) may also be used in identifying one or more interactive condition evaluation tests to and/or in determining parameters of one or more interactive condition evaluation tests. For instance, if the system identifies a first test as a timed treadmill test in which a user must walk on a treadmill for a predetermined distance (as measured by the remote user mobile computing device 170), the required distance may be modified based on an age of a user and/or an expected time (or time to fit into a particular category) may be modified based on the age of the user. Accordingly, in one example, a 65 year old user requesting life insurance may be given a test having a shorter distance or a long expected time than a 25 year old user requesting life insurance.

In step 322, one or more interactive condition evaluation test functions may be initiated by the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. For instance, upon identifying one or more tests for execution, one or more functions associated with administering the tests (e.g., generating interfaces including instructions, transmitting interfaces, processing received data, and the like) may be enabled or activated by or within the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. In some examples, upon completion of the testing process (e.g., upon generating an output) the enabled or activated functions may be disabled or deactivated in order to conserve computing resources.

In step 323, an instruction to activate one or more sensors in the remote user mobile computing device 170 may be generated and transmitted to the remote user mobile computing device 170. For instance, upon identifying one or more interactive condition evaluation tests for execution by the remote user mobile computing device 170, the multi -source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may identify one or more sensors within the remote user mobile computing device 170 that may be used to collect data associated with the identified tests and may transmit an instruction to the remote user mobile computing device 170 to activate or enable the identified sensors. In step 324, the instruction may be received by the remote user mobile computing device 170 and may be executed to activate the identified sensors.

With reference to FIG. 3E, in step 325, a user interface associated with a first test of the identified one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be generated. In some examples, the user interface may include instructions for executing the first test. In step 326, the generated user interface may be transmitted to the remote user mobile computing device 170 and, in step 327, the user interface may be displayed on a display of the remote user mobile computing device 170.

In step 328, the first test may be initiated and sensor data associated with the first test may be collected. For instance, data from one or more sensors monitoring movement, speed, position, and the like, of the remote user mobile computing device 170 may be collected. In some examples, data may be collected based on interaction with one or more user interfaces (e.g., response times, etc.). In step 329, the sensor data may be transmitted from the remote user mobile computing device 170 to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

With reference to FIG. 3F, the sensor data may be received in step 330. In step 331, if additional tests have been identified for execution, a user interface for a second interactive condition evaluation test may be generated. The user interface may include instructions and/or parameters for executing the second interactive condition evaluation test by or with the remote user mobile computing device 170.

In step 332, the user interface may be transmitted to the remote user mobile computing device 170 and, in step 333, the user interface may be displayed on a display of the remote user mobile computing device 170.

In step 334, sensor data associated with execution of the second interactive condition evaluation test may be collected and, in step 335, the collected sensor data may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

With reference to FIG. 3G, in step 336, sensor data associated with the second interactive condition evaluation test may be received. In step 337, the received sensor data (e.g., from the first test, second test, and any other tests) and/or other data (e.g., data from internal sources 120, data from external sources 140, and the like) may be analyzed. In some examples, analyzing the data may include comparing the data to one or more machine learning datasets.

In step 338, social data collection may be initiated by the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. That is, social data such as social media posts and comments from social networking services, email messages, text messages, chats, images, videos, phone calls, contacts, social media friends/connections, etc. may be collected by the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. For instance, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may cause one or more of the internal data computing device 120, the external data computing device 140, the remote user mobile computing device 170, or other computing device to be scanned to collect social data associated with the user. The multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may scan various social networking service accounts, email accounts, and devices associated with the user to collect the social data. The multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may additionally scan various social networking service accounts and devices of friends, connections, relatives, individuals having devices connected to a device of the user, etc. to collect social data related to the user. The social data may be collected with permission of the user and others associated with the user from whom data is collected, such as friends, connections, relatives, individuals having devices connected to a device of the user, etc.

The multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may transmit a request for social data to the external data computing device 140 in step 339 and/or the remote user mobile computing device 170 in step 340. In some examples, the external data computing device 140 is a computing device of an individual associated with the user (e.g., a friend, connection, relative, individual having a device connected to a device of the user, etc.) and participating in a service provided by the multi-source data evaluation and control system. In some examples, requests for social data may be transmitted to additional computing devices, such as internal data computing device 120 or other devices. In some arrangements, the requests for the social data may include a name or other unique identifier of a user, such as an email address or social media account information, that may be used as input in a query to identify the social data.

Referring to FIG. 3H, the request for the social data may be received by the external data computing device 140 in step 341 and by the remote user mobile computing device 170 in step 342. In steps 343 and 344, the social data may be extracted from the external data computing device 140 and remote user mobile computing device 170, respectively. In steps 345 and 346, social data extracted from the external data computing device 140 and the remote user mobile computing device 170, respectively, may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110. In step 347, the extracted social data may be received by the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

Referring to FIG. 31, in step 348 the collected social data may be analyzed by the multi -source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 to glean a user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices. The collected social data may be scanned for language or images which may be reflective of the user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices. In particular, the social data may be scanned to identify both risky and positive behavior on the part of the user. For example, the social data may be scanned for certain language or certain images which describe or show the user engaging in risky or positive behavior. For instance, the social data may be scanned for risky behavior such as smoking, skydiving, heavy drinking, unhealthy eating, use of illegal substances, dangerous driving, illegal activities, fighting, etc., as well as for positive behavior such as healthy eating, exercising, strong social connections, performing charity or volunteer work, learning a foreign language, taking a class, etc. The social data may be further scanned to determine a quantity and a quality of a user's social connections and interactions. For example, to determine the quantity of social connections and interactions, the following information may be collected: a number of text messages or emails sent or received, a number of phone calls placed or received, a number of posts made, a number of posts in which the user is referenced, a number of photos posted, a number of photos containing images of the user, etc. To determine the quality of social connections and interactions the social data may be further scanned to identify, for example, posts containing comments referring to the user's love or affection of another individual or posts referring the love or affection that another individual may have for the user. In some examples, one or more machine learning datasets may be used to analyze the social data to glean the user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices.

In step 349, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may use the analyzed social data to generate a social profile for the user. The social profile may be composed of one or more social scores. The social scores may be calculated by weighting differently defined categories of the analyzed social data to determine a series of component social scores. The component scores may subsequently be aggregated to determine an overall social score. The analyzed social data may be categorized into various categories, such as images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in risky behavior, posts posted by the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, images taken by another individual of the user engaging in risky behavior, posts posted by another individual describing the user engaging in risky behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by another individual to the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, images taken or posted by the user of the user engaging in positive behavior, posts posted by the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, images taken by another individual of the user engaging in positive behavior, posts posted by another individual describing the user engaging in positive behavior, emails/text messages/chats sent by another individual to the user describing the user engaging in positive behavior, text messages sent by the user, text messages received by the user, emails sent by the user, emails received by the user, phone calls placed by the user, phone calls received by the user, chats initiated by the user, chats received by the user, posts posted by the user, posts in which the user is referenced, photos containing images of the user, emails/texts/chats/posts showing meaningful connections, images showing meaningful connections, etc. The number of instances for each of the different categories may be determined, for example, the number of phone calls placed by the user, the number of emails/text messages/chats sent by another individual to the user describing the user engaging in risky behavior, the number of images showing meaningful connections, etc. The series of component social scores may be determined by multiplying the number of instances for each category of analyzed social data by a weighting factor associated with the category. The component social scores may be aggregated to determine an overall social score, and the social profile may be defined by the component social scores and the overall social score. The social profile may be used together with the analyzed sensor and other data from step 337 to determine the user's eligibility and generate an output. For example, when one or more of the social scores is above a corresponding threshold value for that social score and one or more of the test results is above a corresponding threshold value for that particular test, the multi-source data evaluation and control system may determine that the user is eligible for one or more products, incentives, discounts, rebates, etc.

In step 350, an output may be generated based on the analysis of the sensor data and/or other data and based on the generated social profile. For instance, based on the comparison of the data to the one or more machine learning datasets, an output may be generated. In some examples, the generated output may be a life insurance policy having parameters generated based on the analysis of the data. Additionally or alternatively, a premium associated with the life insurance policy may also be generated as an output. In still other examples, a discount, rebate or other incentive may be generated as an output. For instance, if tobacco use is detected, the multi-source data evaluation and control system may generate an incentive such as a rebate if the user stops tobacco use and submits to a subsequent interactive condition evaluation test to confirm the tobacco use has stopped. In this case, subsequent collection of social data may also occur and may be used as an additional method of corroborating that the user has stopped tobacco use. For example, social data may be collected and scanned to confirm that no images, posts, comments, etc. exist showing or describing the user using tobacco since the date the user confirmed the tobacco use was stopped. If images, posts, comments, etc. are found showing or describing the user continuing tobacco use since the date the user confirmed the tobacco use was stopped, the multi-source data evaluation and control system may be unable to make a determination regarding whether the user is eligible for the incentive.

Accordingly, in some examples, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may be unable to make a determination, based on the analysis of the test data and/or the social data, regarding whether a life insurance policy, premium, discount, incentive, etc. may be offered to the user. This may occur, for example, when the results of one or more of the interactive condition evaluation tests is below a threshold value, when one or more of the component or overall social scores is below a threshold value, or when a discrepancy is found between user provided information and analyzed test or social data. In such cases, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may generate output informing the user that additional information is necessary before an eligibility decision may be made. For example, the output may be a notification informing the user that a formal underwriting process and/or a traditional medical examination may be necessary or that the user may need to contact the entity by phone, by mail, or via a website associated with the entity to provide additional information prior to an eligibility decision being made. Various other outputs may be generated without departing from the disclosure.

In step 351, the generated output may be transmitted to, for instance, the remote user mobile computing device 170. Additionally or alternatively, the generated output may be transmitted to another computing device, such as first local computing device 150, second local computing device 155, and/or remote user computing device 175.

In step 352, the generated output may be displayed on the remote user mobile computing device 170. In some examples, displaying the generated output may include an option to accept the offered product or service, identified parameters, and the like. Selection of this option may bind the user and product or service provider. Accordingly, by executing the interactive condition evaluation tests, collecting and analyzing social data, and providing results to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, the user may obtain the desired product or service without submitting to a formal underwriting process, which may include a physical examination, and the like.

FIG. 4 illustrates one example process for generating and evaluating interactive condition evaluations tests and/or other data and collecting and analyzing social data, to generate an output according to one or more aspects described herein. The steps described with respect to FIG. 4 may be performed by one or more of the various devices described herein, such as the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, the interactive test generation multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, remote user mobile computing device 170, and the like. In some examples, one or more of the processes or steps described may be performed in real-time or near real-time.

In step 400, a request for a product may be received. In some examples, the request may be received from a user computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170. In step 402, user information may be received from, for instance, the remote user mobile computing device 170. In some examples, the user information may include information requested by, for instance, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and may include information such as age, gender, location, email address, social media account information, authorization to collect information, and the like.

In step 404, one or more products and interactive tests may be identified. For instance, the received user information may be used to identify one or more products for which the user may be eligible and that meet the request for the product. Based on the identified one or more products, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified to determine whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products.

In step 406, a user interface including instructions for executing an interactive condition evaluation test of the identified one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be generated and transmitted to, for instance, the remote user mobile computing device 170. In step 408, an instruction or command may be transmitted to, for instance, the remote user mobile computing device 170 to activate one or more sensors associated with the interactive condition evaluation test and initiate the interactive condition evaluation test.

In step 410, data may be collected from one or more sensors, monitoring or usage devices, or the like, associated with the remote user mobile computing device 170. For instance, data from sensors associated with the interactive condition evaluation test being executed may be collected and/or transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110.

In step 412, a determination is made as to whether a triggering event has occurred. In some examples, a triggering event may include an indication that a test is complete, that one or more parameters or criteria of the test have been met, that a threshold amount of data has been received, or the like. If, in step 412, a triggering event has not occurred, the process may return to step 410 to continue collecting data.

If, in step 412, a triggering event has occurred, then in step 414, the interactive condition evaluation test may be terminated, e.g., the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may transmit an instruction, signal, or command to terminate the test and, in some examples, disable or deactivate one or more sensors activated for execution of the interactive condition evaluation test.

In step 416, a determination may be made as to whether there are additional tests identified for execution (e.g., a second or more test identified in step 404). If so, the process may return to step 406 and may generate and transmit instructions for a second test, etc.

If, in step 416, a determination is made that there are no additional tests identified for execution, the collected sensor data may be processed in step 418. In some examples, the collected sensor data may be processed itself. In other examples, the collected sensor data may be processed with other data, such as aggregated data from one or more other sources. Processing the sensor data may include comparing the sensor data to one or more machine learning datasets to predict or identify an output.

In step 420, social data such as social media posts and comments from social networking services, email messages, text messages, chats, images related thereto, phone calls, contacts, social media friends/connections, etc. may be collected from one or more sources, such as the external data computing device 140, the remote user mobile computing device 170, or other computing device associated with the user or associated with another individual associated with the user.

In step 422 the collected social data may be analyzed to glean a user's social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices. For instance, the collected social data may be scanned for language and images which may indicate risky and/or positive behavior, habits, or lifestyle choices of the user. Analyzing the social data may include comparing the social data to one or more machine learning datasets to make decisions regarding whether the scanned language and images indicate risky or positive behavior habits.

In step 424, one or more social scores may be calculated using the collected social data. In particular a series of component social scores may be calculated for each category of analyzed social data by multiplying the number of instances for the category of analyzed social data by a weighted factor. The series of component social scores may be aggregated to determine an overall social score. A social score may be generated comprising the component and overall social scores.

In step 426, an output may be generated, based on the results of the interactive condition evaluation tests and/or the social profile generated from the collected social data. The output may be transmitted to and displayed, for example, via a display of remote user mobile computing device 170. In some examples, the output may include an insurance product recommendation, a premium for an insurance product, a discount or other incentive, or the like. In some examples, the output may include a notification that a determination regarding whether an insurance product recommendation, a premium for an insurance product, a discount or other incentive, etc. may be offered to the user could not be made based solely on the results of the interactive condition evaluation tests and/or the collected social data. In this case, the output may indicate that additional information is needed from the user before an eligibility decision may be made.

FIG. 5 illustrates one example process for aggregating data from disparate sources to generate an output according to one or more aspects described herein. The steps described with respect to FIG. 5 may be performed by one or more of the various devices described herein, such as the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, remote user mobile computing device, and the like. In some examples, one or more of the processes or steps described may be performed in real-time or near real-time.

In step 500, a request for a product may be received. In some examples, the request may be received from a user computing device, such as remote user mobile computing device 170. In step 502, user information may be received from, for instance, the remote user mobile computing device 170. In some examples, the user information may include information requested by, for instance, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 and may include information such as age, gender, location, email address, social media account information, authorization to collect data, and the like.

In step 504, one or more products may be identified. For instance, the received user information may be used to identify one or more products for which the user may be eligible and that meet the request for the product. In step 506, data may be received from a plurality of sources. For instance, data may be received from sources internal to an entity and/or sources external to an entity. For example, data may be received from one or more internal sources and may include data associated with a user, such as age, gender, location, whether the user is a homeowner, marital status, insurance history, claim history, driving behaviors, and the like.

In some examples, data may be received from one or more external sources and may include data associated with the user, such as medical/prescription history, consumer data such as transaction or purchase history, behavioral information (e.g., gym membership, gym usage, and the like), as well as other external data, such as social data. For example, a source external to the multi-source data evaluation and control system may collect raw social data and process the social data to determine a user's social behavior, habits and lifestyle choices. In this case, the multi-source data evaluation and control system may receive the raw or already processed social data from the external data source. In some examples, at least some data may be received with permission of the user.

In some examples, data received may be data associated with a computing device associated with the user. For instance, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may receive data associated with movement of a user's mobile computing device, how often the device is in motion, type or motion or speed (e.g., walking vs. driving), types of applications often executed on the mobile device, and the like.

In step 508, the received data may be aggregated and, in step 510, the data may be processed to determine whether a user is eligible for the one or more products identified. In some examples, if raw or processed social data is received from an external source in step 506, the social data may be further analyzed to determine social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices or the user and/or to determine one or more component and overall social scores, and to generate a social profile based on the social scores. In some examples, processing the data may include using one or more machine learning datasets to determine social behavior, habits, and lifestyle choices from raw social data, determine eligibility, generate an output, and the like. In step 512, an output may be generated and or displayed, for instance, on a user computing device.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example process for renewing a product using interactive condition evaluation tests and collected social data, according to one or more aspects described herein. The steps described with respect to FIG. 6 may be performed by one or more of the various devices described herein, such as the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110, the multi-source data evaluation and control server 210, remote user mobile computing device, and the like. In some examples, one or more of the processes or steps described may be performed in real-time or near real-time.

In step 600, a binding acceptance of an offered product or generated output may be received. In some examples, upon generating and displaying an output to a user, the user may have an option to select to accept an offer associated with the output. In some arrangements, accepting the offer may be a binding agreement and, for instance, may be performed without conventional underwriting processes. In step 602, based on the binding acceptance, the product or generated output may be enabled or enacted. For instance, if the generated output is an insurance policy, acceptance of the binding offer may cause the policy to go into effect.

In step 604, a determination may be made as to whether a predetermined time period has elapsed. For example, the selected product or output may be enacted for a predetermined time period or term. Upon expiration of that term, the product may be cancelled if it is not renewed. Accordingly, in advance of the product being cancelled, and after a predetermined time (e.g., a predetermined time less than the term of the product), the system may offer the user an option to renew. Accordingly, the system may determine whether the predetermined time period less than the term of the product has elapsed. If not, the product may remain enabled or enacted in step 606.

If, in step 604, the time period has elapsed, the user may renew the product. In step 608, the user may be authenticated to the system. For instance, a notification may be transmitted to the user requesting the user to login to the system for renewal. In some examples, logging in for renewal may include determining whether user authenticating credentials match pre-stored user authenticating credentials. In some examples, credentials may include username and password, biometric data such as fingerprint, iris scan, facial recognition, and the like.

In step 610, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified to determine whether the user is eligible to renew, one or more parameters of the renewal may be identified, and the like. Similar to other aspects described herein, the interactive condition evaluation tests may be identified based on user information, a current product, and the like.

In step 612, the additional tests may be executed. Similar to other arrangements described herein, the additional tests may be executed via a computing device of the user (e.g., remote user mobile computing device 170). In step 614, test data may be collected from test execution and may be processed, for instance, using one or more machine learning datasets.

In step 616, social data related to the user may be collected from one or more data sources. The collected social date may be analyzed in step 618 to glean social behaviors, habits, and lifestyle choices of the user. In step 620 the analyzed social data may be used to calculate component and overall social scores which may be used to generate a social profile for the user.

In step 622, based on the processed test data and the generated social profile, an output may be generated and displayed to the user. In some examples, the output may include an offer or recommendation to maintain or renew the product currently enabled or to modify the product (e.g., obtain a different product, modify one or more parameters of the product, and the like) or may be a notification indicating that additional information is needed before a multi-source data evaluation may be made regarding an offer or recommendation to maintain, renew, or modify the product.

FIG. 7 illustrates one example user interface that may be generated and transmitted to a mobile device of a user. The user interface 700 may include identification of a first test, instructions for performing the first test, and the like. The user may initiate the test by selecting “GO” or other option.

FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate example user interfaces providing a generated output. Referring to FIG. 8A, the interface 800 a may include an indication of the product for which the user is eligible or the product being offered, as well as a cost associated with the product. In some examples, a link may be provided to additional information, parameters, term, conditions, and the like. The interface 800 a may further include an option to accept the offer. Acceptance of the offer may bind the user in real-time, in at least some examples.

Referring to FIG. 8B, the interface 800 b may include a notification indicating that additional information is necessary prior to a multi-source data evaluation being made. In some examples, a link may be provided to provide the user with additional details about the additional information needed to proceed with determining eligibility.

FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of a computing device (or system) 901 in a computer system 900 that may be used according to one or more illustrative embodiments of the disclosure. The computing device 901 may have a processor 903 for controlling overall operation of the computing device 901 and its associated components, including RAM 905, ROM 907, input/output module 909, and memory 915. The computing device 901, along with one or more additional devices (e.g., terminals 950 and 951, security and integration hardware 960) may correspond to any of multiple systems or devices, such as a user personal mobile computing device, computing platform, or a computer server, configured as described herein for collecting data, identifying and executing one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, evaluating data, generating a social profile, generating outputs, and the like.

Input/Output (I/O) 909 may include a microphone, keypad, touch screen, and/or stylus through which a user of the computing device 901 may provide input, and may also include one or more of a speaker for providing audio output and a video display device for providing textual, audiovisual and/or graphical output. Software may be stored within memory 915 and/or storage to provide instructions to processor 903 for enabling computing device 901 to perform various actions. For example, memory 915 may store software used by the computing device 901, such as an operating system 917, application programs 919, and an associated internal database 921. The various hardware memory units in memory 915 may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Certain devices/systems within the multi-source data evaluation and control system may have minimum hardware requirements in order to support sufficient storage capacity, analysis capacity, network communication, etc. For instance, in some embodiments, one or more nonvolatile hardware memory units having a minimum size (e.g., at least 1 gigabyte (GB), 2 GB, 5 GB, etc.), and/or one or more volatile hardware memory units having a minimum size (e.g., 256 megabytes (MB), 512 MB, 1 GB, etc.) may be used in a device 901 (e.g., a mobile computing device 901, multi-source data evaluation and control server 901, external server 901, etc.), in order to store and execute multi-source data evaluation and control software application, execute tests, collect and analyze data, generate a social profile, generate outputs, generate recommendations and/or incentives, etc. Memory 915 also may include one or more physical persistent memory devices and/or one or more non-persistent memory devices. Memory 915 may include, but is not limited to, random access memory (RAM) 905, read only memory (ROM) 907, electronically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store the desired information and that can be accessed by processor 903.

Processor 903 may include a single central processing unit (CPU), which may be a single-core or multi-core processor (e.g., dual-core, quad-core, etc.), or may include multiple CPUs. Processor(s) 903 may have various bit sizes (e.g., 16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit, 96-bit, 128-bit, etc.) and various processor speeds (ranging from 100 MHz to 5 Ghz or faster). Processor(s) 903 and its associated components may allow the system 901 to execute a series of computer-readable instructions, for example, to identify interactive condition evaluation tests, executing tests, collecting and analyzing data, generating outputs, and the like.

The computing device (e.g., a mobile computing device, computing platform, server, external server, etc.) may operate in a networked environment 900 supporting connections to one or more remote computers, such as terminals 950 and 951. The terminals 950 and 951 may be personal computers, servers (e.g., web servers, database servers), or mobile communication devices (e.g., mobile phones, portable computing devices, on-board vehicle-based computing systems, and the like), and may include some or all of the elements described above with respect to the computing device 901. The network connections depicted in FIG. 9 include a local area network (LAN) 925 and a wide area network (WAN) 929, and a wireless telecommunications network 933, but may also include other networks. When used in a LAN networking environment, the computing device 901 may be connected to the LAN 925 through a network interface or adapter 923. When used in a WAN networking environment, the device 901 may include a modem 927 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 929, such as network 931 (e.g., the Internet). When used in a wireless telecommunications network 933, the device 901 may include one or more transceivers, digital signal processors, and additional circuitry and software for communicating with wireless computing devices 940 (e.g., mobile phones, portable computing devices, on-board vehicle-based computing systems, etc.) via one or more network devices 935 (e.g., base transceiver stations) in the wireless network 933.

Also illustrated in FIG. 9 is a security and integration layer 960, through which communications may be sent and managed between the device 901 (e.g., a user's personal mobile device, an multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform or server, etc.) and the remote devices (950 and 951) and remote networks (925, 929, and 933). The security and integration layer 960 may comprise one or more separate computing devices, such as web servers, authentication servers, and/or various networking components (e.g., firewalls, routers, gateways, load balancers, etc.), having some or all of the elements described above with respect to the computing device 901. As an example, a security and integration layer 960 of a mobile computing device, computing platform, or a server operated by an insurance provider, financial institution, governmental entity, or other organization, may comprise a set of web application servers configured to use secure protocols and to insulate the server 901 from external devices 950 and 951. In some cases, the security and integration layer 960 may correspond to a set of dedicated hardware and/or software operating at the same physical location and under the control of same entities as driving data analysis server 901. For example, layer 960 may correspond to one or more dedicated web servers and network hardware in an organizational datacenter or in a cloud infrastructure supporting a cloud-based driving data analysis system. In other examples, the security and integration layer 960 may correspond to separate hardware and software components which may be operated at a separate physical location and/or by a separate entity.

As discussed below, the data transferred to and from various devices in the system 900 may include secure and sensitive data, such as device usage data, application usage data, medical or personal information, test result data, and the like. Therefore, it may be desirable to protect transmissions of such data by using secure network protocols and encryption, and also to protect the integrity of the data when stored on in a database or other storage in a mobile device, multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform, or server and other computing devices in the system 900, by using the security and integration layer 960 to authenticate users and restrict access to unknown or unauthorized users. In various implementations, security and integration layer 960 may provide, for example, a file-based integration scheme or a service-based integration scheme for transmitting data between the various devices in the system 900. Data may be transmitted through the security and integration layer 960, using various network communication protocols. Secure data transmission protocols and/or encryption may be used in file transfers to protect to integrity of the driving data, for example, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP), and/or Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) encryption. In other examples, one or more web services may be implemented within the various devices 901 in the system 900 and/or the security and integration layer 960. The web services may be accessed by authorized external devices and users to support input, extraction, and manipulation of the data (e.g., device usage data, location data, vehicle data, etc.) between the various devices 901 in the system 900. Web services built to support system 900 may be cross-domain and/or cross-platform, and may be built for enterprise use. Such web services may be developed in accordance with various web service standards, such as the Web Service Interoperability (WS-I) guidelines. In some examples, a movement data and/or driving data web service may be implemented in the security and integration layer 960 using the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) or Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol to provide secure connections between servers 901 and various clients 950 and 951 (e.g., mobile devices, data analysis servers, etc.). SSL or TLS may use HTTP or HTTPS to provide authentication and confidentiality. In other examples, such web services may be implemented using the WS-Security standard, which provides for secure SOAP messages using XML, encryption. In still other examples, the security and integration layer 960 may include specialized hardware for providing secure web services. For example, secure network appliances in the security and integration layer 960 may include built-in features such as hardware-accelerated SSL and HTTPS, WS-Security, and firewalls. Such specialized hardware may be installed and configured in the security and integration layer 960 in front of the web servers, so that any external devices may communicate directly with the specialized hardware.

Although not shown in FIG. 9, various elements within memory 915 or other components in the system 900, may include one or more caches, for example, CPU caches used by the processing unit 903, page caches used by the operating system 917, disk caches of a hard drive, and/or database caches used to cache content from database 921. For embodiments including a CPU cache, the CPU cache may be used by one or more processors in the processing unit 903 to reduce memory latency and access time. In such examples, a processor 903 may retrieve data from or write data to the CPU cache rather than reading/writing to memory 915, which may improve the speed of these operations. In some examples, a database cache may be created in which certain data from a database 921 (e.g., interactive condition evaluation test result database, internal data database, external data database, etc.) is cached in a separate smaller database on an application server separate from the database server. For instance, in a multi-tiered application, a database cache on an application server can reduce data retrieval and data manipulation time by not needing to communicate over a network with a back-end database server. These types of caches and others may be included in various embodiments, and may provide potential advantages in certain implementations of performing functions describes herein.

It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are illustrative and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used. The existence of any of various network protocols such as TCP/IP, Ethernet, FTP, HTTP and the like, and of various wireless communication technologies such as GSM, CDMA, WiFi, and WiMAX, is presumed, and the various computer devices and system components described herein may be configured to communicate using any of these network protocols or technologies.

Additionally, one or more application programs 919 may be used by the various computing devices 901 within the system 900 (e.g., software applications, etc.), including computer executable instructions for identifying one or more products, identifying one or more interactive condition evaluation tests, executing interactive condition evaluation tests, collecting data, analyzing data, and the like, as described herein.

As discussed herein, various examples for generating an output based on different types of data from different sources are described. In some examples, machine learning may be used to generate one or more outputs. Using data from various different sources, as well as different types of data, may provide more accurate predictions of risk, mortality, and the like, in order to generate and offer outputs that are more closely tailored to a user's needs.

Further, using the various types of data, as well as machine learning, may allow an entity generating an output to better align pricing with a determined risk. In conventional systems, it may take several years to evaluate outputs, such as a determined risk for a particular user, a predicted mortality, or the like. By processing great volumes of data to generate machine learning datasets, validation of risk predictions or assumptions, and the like may be performed much more quickly which ultimately may allow for pricing of products (e.g., insurance policies, and the like) at a more granular level.

As discussed, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be used to collect data associated with a user, assess conditions of the user, the resulting test data, together with other data, such as social data, may be used to determine whether a user is eligible for a product, and/or to generate an output (e.g., an insurance policy to offer, a premium for an insurance policy, a discount or incentive, or the like). Below are several example interactive condition evaluation tests that may be used with one or more arrangements described herein. Various other tests may be used without departing from the disclosure and nothing in the examples below should be viewed as limiting the interactive condition evaluation tests to only these examples.

In one example, an interactive condition evaluation test may include evaluating mobility of a user. Accordingly, the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 may generate a user interface including instructions for executing a mobility test using a mobile device of the user. The user may receive the interface which may be displayed on the mobile device. In some examples, the test may include instructing a user to walk, run, jog, or the like, a predetermined distance. Sensors within the mobile device may track the distance walked, time for walking the distance, pace of the user, and the like. In some examples, data related to heart rate of the user, pulse of the user, and the like, may also be collected by one or more sensors in the mobile device. This information may then be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 for processing and analysis.

In another example, a user may be instructed to walk, run, jog, or the like, on a treadmill for a predetermined time, at a predetermined pace, or the like, while carrying the user's mobile device. Sensors within the device may detect and/or collect data associated with performance of the test, heart rate, pulse, and the like, and this information may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 for processing and analysis.

In some arrangements, for either of the above-described example interactive tests, video may be captured of the user while performing the test. This video may be further evaluated to determine a gait of user, how easily the user managed the interactive test, or the like.

In other example interactive tests, a user may be instructed to perform one or more other physical functions (e.g., outside of walking, running or the like). For instance, a user may be requested to hold his or her arms in front of his or her body for as long as possible while holding the mobile device. One or more sensors within the mobile device may collect data associated with a position of the mobile device, time in a particular position, and the like, and this information may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 for processing and analysis.

In some examples, similar physical tests may be performed with a user's legs (e.g., sit in chair and extend legs).

In some examples, one or more interactive tests may test a reflex of a user. For instance, an image may be displayed on a mobile device of a user with instructions to touch one or more icons indicating a certain item (e.g., a plurality of icons are displayed, touch or select all that are a particular object). The sensors and/or other mobile device components may detect not only how many correct answers the user provided but also how quickly the user was able to respond (e.g., how quickly the user could touch the screen). This data may then be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 for processing an analysis.

In another example interactive condition evaluation test for reflexes, the user may be instructed to touch a display of the mobile device as quickly as possible upon seeing a particular prompt. The mobile device may then collect data associated with how quickly the user touched the display and may transmit that data for processing and analysis.

Additional interactive condition evaluation tests may be directed to evaluating a user's recall. For instance, a user may be provided with a list of words that they may view for a predetermined time period. After the time period expires, the user may be requested to input as many words as he or she can remember. The words may be input via a keyboard (e.g., virtual or physical) or spoken.

In some examples, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may be used to evaluate a lung capacity or respiration of a user. For instance, a tobacco user may have a reduced lung capacity, increased respiration rate, or the like. Accordingly, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may include having a user exhale onto a mobile device and one or more sensors may be detect a number of exhalations, a velocity of the breath, a rate of exhalations, and the like. In some examples, the user may exhale onto a microphone of the mobile device and the audio received may be processed to determine a strength of exhale, number of exhalations, and the like. In some examples, one or more test may request a user to exhale for a predetermined amount of time while positioned a predetermined distance from the mobile device. This information may be transmitted to the multi-source data evaluation and control computing platform 110 for processing and analysis.

In some examples, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may include monitoring sleep habits of a user. This data may then be transmitted for processing and analysis.

In some examples, one or more interactive condition evaluation tests may including requesting a user to capture one or more images of particular body parts, or the like. For instance, images of the user may be used to determine height, weight, overall health appearance, and the like. In some examples, the user may be requested to submit particular images. For instance, a close up image of an eye of a user may be used to determine one or more health issues, such as coronary disease, hypertension, diabetes, and the like.

In some examples, the system may generate a plurality of tests for execution. A user may, in some examples, complete some or all of the tests. If the user completes fewer than all of the tests, the output generated may be impacted by completion of fewer than all of the identified tests (e.g., output may include a higher premium for a policy than a user completing all tests, discount or incentive may be different from a user who completed all tests, or the like).

Although various aspects described herein are described as being executed by a mobile device of a user, a mobile device may, in some examples, include a wearable device, such as a fitness tracker. One or more tests may be executed via the fitness tracker, data may be collected and transmitted, and the like. In some examples, data from a fitness tracker or other wearable device may be used in combination with other data (e.g., may be used as data from an external source, collected, aggregated and processed, as discussed herein).

Data from sources other than the interactive condition evaluation tests may also be used, as discussed herein. For instance, data from internal sources and/or external sources may be used to evaluate risk, generate outputs, provide offers, and the like.

For instance, in some examples, data associated with usage of a mobile device may be collected and used in analyzing eligibility, generating outputs, and the like. For instance, types of applications accessed by a user, how often applications are accessed, and the like, may be collected and used in the analysis. For example, if a user executes one or more health or fitness applications on a mobile device, that may indicate a healthy lifestyle. Alternatively, if the mobile device is often used for streaming video, that may indicated a more sedentary lifestyle. These factors may be used to evaluate eligibility, determine an output, or the like.

As discussed herein, various types of internal data may be collected and used in making various output determinations. For instance, if the entity implementing the system is an insurance provider, data associated with home insurance, auto insurance, life insurance, and the like may be used. In some examples, historical data such as claims data, and the like, may be used in generating one or more machine learning datasets. Data associated with a particular user requesting a product may also be extracted and used to generate an output. For example, user claim history, vehicle operational data or driving behaviors (e.g., as collected from a vehicle of the user, mobile device of the user, or the like), may be used.

As also discussed herein, various types of external data may be collected and used in making various output determinations. In some examples, the external data may be received from one or more sources external to an entity implementing the system. The external sources may include publicly available information, anonymous information, information collected with permission of the user, and the like. Some examples of external data are provided below. However, various other types of external data may be collected and used without departing from the disclosure and the examples below should not be viewed as limiting external data to only these types of data.

In some examples, consumer data such as transaction data and the like may be used. For instance, data collected via a loyalty program at grocery stores, department stores, and the like, may be used to evaluate a lifestyle of user. Data such as types of purchases made, locations of purchase, frequency of purchase, amount of purchase, and the like may be considered. In some examples, purchases made at a grocery store (e.g., healthy foods, cigarettes, alcohol, or the like) may be collected and evaluated to generate one or more outputs.

In some examples, external data such as medical information of the user may be collected and used in the analysis. This data may be collected with permission of the user and may include prescriptions used, medical diagnosis, recent lab results, recent results of a physical examination, family medical history, electronic health records, and the like.

In some arrangements, other behavioral data may be used. For instance, whether a user has a membership to a gym, how often the user visits the gym, and the like, may be used. In some examples, global positioning system data may be used to determine or verify a position of a user (e.g., user visits a gym 5 days/week). Additionally or alternatively, detecting behaviors such as marathon running, 5K running, or the like, may be detected from sensor data, as well as time, pace, and the like. This data may be collected and used in evaluation for generating outputs.

Data associated with occupation and/or hobbies may also be considered. For instance, detection of, for instance, skydiving, as a hobby (e.g., based on altimeter sensor data from a mobile device) may indicate a risk factor for a user. In some examples, data associated with an occupation may be collected. For instance, detection of frequent changes in altitude, speed, and the like, may indicate a user is a flight attendant, pilot, or the like. This information may be used in evaluation.

In some examples, social data may be collected, analyzed, and used to evaluate risk, generate outputs, provide offers, and the like, as described herein. The collected social data may further be used to identify discrepancies in information provided by the user. For example, in addition to being used to make eligibility determinations, collected social data may be used to identify any discrepancies that may exist in information provided by a user, such as on an application provided by the user to the entity. For example, if a user has indicated on an application that the user is a non-smoker and social data collected for the user describes or shows the user smoking, such information may be used to identify a discrepancy in the application. In such situations, the system may determine that a formal underwriting process must be undertaken or that additional information must be provided before an eligibility determination may be made.

In some examples, user data may be collected over a period of time to determine how sedentary a life a user lives. For instance, the movement of the mobile device may be tracked via one or more sensors and that information may be transmitted for processing and analysis. In some examples, this data may be collected during an eligibility evaluation process (e.g., before an output is generated, an offer is provided, or the like). Additionally or alternatively, the data may be collected during a term of, for instance, an insurance policy, to monitor a user's lifestyle. In some examples, historical data from a time prior to the user requesting a product may be collected and evaluated to identify potential risk. Data may also be collected after the user has purchased the product to continue to evaluate risk. This continuous or continued collection may be also be used for dynamic pricing (e.g., pricing that may change based on detected behaviors) and/or for renewal of a product.

As discussed herein, in some examples, a user may accept a generated output or offer and a binding agreement may be made. In some arrangements, one or more of the data collection, processing, offer and acceptance may be performed in real-time. In some examples, the binding agreement may be based solely on the data collected from interactive condition evaluation tests, collected social data, a generated social profile, internal data, external data, and the like (e.g., without traditional underwriting, physical examination or the like). In other examples, a user may be provided with an output having a first price. Acceptance of the offer may include the user agreeing to the first price, however, an incentive may be generated for a user to provide additional information, such as recent medical examination results, lab work, or the like. Accordingly, a rebate, refund, credit, or the like, may be offered for providing this additional information.

In some examples, a user may also permit an entity to use the collected data, generated outputs, test results, and the like in determining eligibility for one or more other products. For instance, a system may generate a recommended other product (e.g., long term care insurance, auto insurance, or the like) and the data collected may be used to evaluate risk, eligibility, and the like. In some examples, the data may be used to evaluate requests made by the user for additional products.

As discussed above, biometric data such as fingerprints and the like, and/or facial recognition data may be used to authenticate a user, provide additional functionality, and the like. For instance, upon initiating an interactive condition evaluation test, a user may be requested to capture an image of himself or herself. Facial recognition may then be used to confirm that the image captured corresponds to the user. In some examples, public records may be used to confirm this information. In other examples, the user may be asked to provide an image of, for instance, a driver's license. This may then be compared to a captured image to verify the identity of the user.

In some arrangements, fingerprint or other biometric data may also be used. For instance, a user may submit a fingerprint with acceptance of an offer, for an insurance policy or the like. If a claim is then made against the policy, or a modification is requested, the user may authenticate by submitting a fingerprint.

In another example, a beneficiary of an insurance policy may be identified by his or her fingerprint. Accordingly, the beneficiary may submit the fingerprint upon a user purchasing the policy. The beneficiary may then submit a fingerprint to submit a claim.

In some arrangements, one or more aspects described herein may be embodied in an application executing on a computing device of a user. In some arrangements, upon opening the application, various functionality may be enabled. For instance, sensors may be activated, permission may be given to collect data, and the like. Although various aspects described herein are described with respect to life insurance policies, one or more aspects described herein may be used to evaluate eligibility for other products or services, such as auto insurance, homeowners insurance, long term care insurance, and the like.

One or more aspects of the disclosure may be embodied in computer-usable data or computer-executable instructions, such as in one or more program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices to perform the operations described herein. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and the like that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types when executed by one or more processors in a computer or other data processing device. The computer-executable instructions may be stored as computer-readable instructions on a computer-readable medium such as a hard disk, optical disk, removable storage media, solid-state memory, RAM, and the like. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments. In addition, the functionality may be embodied in whole or in part in firmware or hardware equivalents, such as integrated circuits, Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA), and the like. Particular data structures may be used to more effectively implement one or more aspects of the disclosure, and such data structures are contemplated to be within the scope of computer executable instructions and computer-usable data described herein.

Various aspects described herein may be embodied as a method, an apparatus, or as one or more computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions. Accordingly, those aspects may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, an entirely firmware embodiment, or an embodiment combining software, hardware, and firmware aspects in any combination. Furthermore, such aspects may take the form of a computer program product stored by one or more computer-readable storage media having computer-readable program code, or instructions, embodied in or on the storage media. In addition, various signals representing data or events as described herein may be transferred between a source and a destination in the form of light or electromagnetic waves traveling through signal-conducting media such as metal wires, optical fibers, or wireless transmission media (e.g., air or space). In general, the one or more computer-readable media may be and/or include one or more non-transitory computer-readable media.

As described herein, the various methods and acts may be operative across one or more computing servers and one or more networks. The functionality may be distributed in any manner, or may be located in a single computing device (e.g., a server, a client computer, and the like). For example, in alternative embodiments, one or more of the computing platforms discussed above may be combined into a single computing platform, and the various functions of each computing platform may be performed by the single computing platform. In such arrangements, any and/or all of the above-discussed communications between computing platforms may correspond to data being accessed, moved, modified, updated, and/or otherwise used by the single computing platform. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the computing platforms discussed above may be implemented in one or more virtual machines that are provided by one or more physical computing devices. In such arrangements, the various functions of each computing platform may be performed by the one or more virtual machines, and any and/or all of the above-discussed communications between computing platforms may correspond to data being accessed, moved, modified, updated, and/or otherwise used by the one or more virtual machines.

Aspects of the disclosure have been described in terms of illustrative embodiments thereof. Numerous other embodiments, modifications, and variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims will occur to persons of ordinary skill in the art from a review of this disclosure. For example, one or more of the steps depicted in the illustrative figures may be performed in other than the recited order, one or more steps described with respect to one figure may be used in combination with one or more steps described with respect to another figure, and/or one or more depicted steps may be optional in accordance with aspects of the disclosure. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method, comprising: receiving, from a user computing device, a user input including user information for a user; identifying, based on the received user information, one or more products for evaluation; transmitting, to one or more computing devices, a request for social data related to the user; receiving, from the one or more computing devices, the social data related to the user; analyzing, using one or more machine learning datasets, the social data to evaluate social behavior of the user; calculating, based on the analyzed social behavior, one or more social scores; determining, based on the one or more social scores, whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; generating an output indicating whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; and sending, to the user computing device, the output for display.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the social data includes one or more of: a social media post, an email, a text message, a chat message, an image, a video, and a list of friends or connections.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the social data to evaluate the social behavior of the user comprises: scanning the social data for language or images indicative of the social behavior of the user; and analyzing, using the one or more machine learning datasets, the language or images to evaluate the social behavior of the user.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the social data to evaluate the social behavior of the user comprises: determining one or more categories of analyzed social data; and calculating the one or more social scores comprises calculating the one or more social scores based on weighting differently each of the one or more categories of analyzed social data.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more categories of the analyzed social data include a number of images showing the user engaging in risky behavior, a number of posts describing the user engaging in risky behavior, a number of images showing the user engaging in positive behavior, a number of posts describing the user engaging in positive behavior, a number of friends/connections the user has, a number of text messages sent/received by the user, a number of phone calls placed/received by the user, a number of posts posted by the user, and a number of posts referencing the user.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products comprises: determining that one or more of the one or more social scores is above a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that one or more of the one or more social scores is above the corresponding threshold value, determining that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products, wherein the output indicates that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products comprises: determining that at least one of the one or more social scores is below a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that at least one of the one or more social scores is below the corresponding threshold value, determining that eligibility of the user for the identified one or more products is uncertain, wherein the output indicates that eligibility for the identified one or more products could not be determined and additional information is required.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products is further based on results of an interactive condition evaluation test.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the interactive condition evaluation test includes at least one of a biometric test, a mobility test, a reflex test, and a cognitive skills tests.
 10. A multi-source data evaluation computing device, comprising: a processing unit comprising a processor; and a memory unit storing computer-executable instructions, which when executed by the processing unit, cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to: receive, from a user computing device, a user input including user information for a user; based on the received user information, identify one or more products for evaluation; transmit, to one or more computing devices, a request for social data related to the user; receive, from the one or more computing devices, the social data related to the user; analyze, using one or more machine learning datasets, the social data to evaluate social behavior of the user; calculate, based on the analyzed social behavior, one or more social scores; determine, based on the one or more social scores, whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; generate an output indicating whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; and send, to the user computing device, the output for display.
 11. The multi-source data evaluation computing device of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to analyze the social data by: scanning the social data for language or images indicative of the social behavior of the user; and analyzing, using the one or more machine learning datasets, the language or images to evaluate the social behavior of the user.
 12. The multi-source data evaluation computing device of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to: analyze the social data to determine one or more categories of analyzed social data; and calculate the one or more social scores by weighting differently each of the one or more categories of analyzed social data.
 13. The multi-source data evaluation computing device of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to: determine that one or more of the one or more social scores is above a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that one or more of the one or more social scores is above the corresponding threshold value, determine that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products, wherein the output indicates that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products.
 14. The multi-source data evaluation computing device of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to: determine that at least one of the one or more social scores is below a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that at least one of the one or more social scores is below the corresponding threshold value, determine that eligibility of the user for the identified one or more products is uncertain, wherein the output indicates that eligibility for the identified one or more products could not be determined and additional information is required.
 15. The multi-source data evaluation computing device of claim 10, wherein the instructions further cause the multi-source data evaluation computing device to determine whether user is eligible for the identified one or more products, further based on results of an interactive condition evaluation test.
 16. A non-transitory, computer-readable media storing instructions that, when executed by a computing platform comprising at least one processor, memory, and communication interface, cause the computing platform to: receive, from a user computing device, a user input including user information for a user; based on the received user information, identify one or more products for evaluation; transmit, to one or more computing devices, a request for social data related to the user; receive, from the one or more computing devices, the social data related to the user; analyze, using one or more machine learning datasets, the social data to evaluate social behavior of the user; calculate, based on the analyzed social behavior, one or more social scores; determine, based on the one or more social scores, whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; generate an output indicating whether the user is eligible for the identified one or more products; and send, to the user computing device, the output for display.
 17. The non-transitory, computer-readable media of claim 16, wherein the instructions further cause the computing platform to analyze the social data by: scanning the social data for language or images indicative of the social behavior of the user; analyzing, using the one or more machine learning datasets, the language or images to evaluate the social behavior of the user.
 18. The non-transitory, computer-readable media of claim 16, wherein the instructions further cause the computing platform to: analyze the social data to determine one or more categories of analyzed social data; and calculate the one or more social scores by weighting differently each of the one or more categories of analyzed social data.
 19. The non-transitory, computer-readable media of claim 16, wherein the instructions further cause the computing platform to: determine that one or more of the one or more social scores is above a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that one or more of the one or more social scores is above the corresponding threshold value, determine that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products, wherein the output indicates that the user is eligible for the identified one or more products.
 20. The non-transitory, computer-readable media of claim 16, wherein the instructions further cause the computing platform to: determine that at least one of the one or more social scores is below a corresponding threshold value; and in response to the determination that at least one of the one or more social scores is below the corresponding threshold value, determine that eligibility of the user for the identified one or more products is uncertain, wherein the output indicates that eligibility for the identified one or more products could not be determined and additional information is required. 